ARTICLES:
Politics and Society
Abductees
Speak
Transracial Adoptees Take On the Adoption Industry
Stephanie
Cho and Kim So Yung are fighting to expose the unequal power between
the white adoption industry and children of color adoptees. Here,
they reflect on how their childhood experiences made them think
about racism and adoption, and how they became political activists.
By
Stephanie Cho and Kim So Yung
June
2003
Stephanie
Cho and Kim So Yung are co-founders of Transracial Abductees, an
organization that works to educate transracial adoptees and communities
of color and expose the unequal power between the white adoption
industry and children of color adoptees. They choose the word "abduction"
to describe how the adoption industry forcibly removes children
of color from their families and communities and assimilates them
into their new white families and society.
In
this article, they reflect on their experiences growing up in the
Northwest United States, when they started thinking about racism
and adoption, and how they became political about it.
Stephanie:
Sometimes my memories are pictures that are revisited. I can't remember
if it is a picture I saw when I was younger or if it is really my
own memory but I think I first noticed racism when I met my white
family. There have been arguments made that racism happens when
contact between white and colored meet. This might have been true
for me.
When
I first came here, my mom used to say I was so small I looked like
a "china doll". She meant that as a term of endearment
but I would describe it now as racism.
Knowing
that I was adopted and recognizing racism happened at the same time
for me. People acknowledging the fact that I was adopted was also
acknowledging that I was a person of color. This would usually result
in someone saying I looked like a "china doll" or saying
something about my imported status, like when did you get her like
I was just shipped and delivered onsite (which I was).
I
started becoming political when I came out as queer. Queer people
are all about identity issues and from that I re-identified and
basically reclaimed me back. I used to work on people of color issues
without really working on transracial adoption issues. Like my assimilation
taught me, transracial adoption is not a people of color issue.
I know now, centrally, my adoption is one of the major reasons I
organize around people of color issues and that even my queer identity
is centered around my transracial adoption identity. I know other
adoptees that work in the people of color movement but don't work
in the transracial abductee movement. I think that will start to
change in the next 5-10 years, but for now it is matter of doing
some strong political education with other people of color organizations.
They need to learn to be good allies of transracial adoptees that
work in their movement and learn to support them as a moving force
in the people of color movement because transracial adoption is
a people of color issue.
So
Yung: I always knew I was adopted because of the obvious difference
in looks between my white adoptive parents and me. My parents always
tried to downplay it, and teach me that I was no different from
anyone else, meaning that I was "as good as white." All
the time I was growing up, I wasn't allowed to question my parents'
definition of what my being a Korean adoptee meant. I wasn't allowed
to explore Korean culture or ask questions about the war in Korea.
I especially wasn't allowed to talk about racism.
I
always felt a certain sting when my family or people we met would
say something racist. They would talk about how beautiful and exotic
I was. My mom would always coo over my "rosebud lips."
My friends would express jealousy over my "silky straight hair"
and "smooth, clear skin." They would always want my hair
and acne-free skin, but never my skin color or my "Chinese"
eyes.
When
I was around middle school age I began to name the racism I felt
happening. That was quickly squashed by my parents, who used physical
punishment to keep my brother, also a Korean adoptee, and me from
"accusing" people of racism. During that brief period
of rebellion, my brother and I actually talked about how people
in our family, school, and whole town were racist, and would make
a point of calling each other by our Korean names. But we were totally
dependent on our parents. We were very isolated in a small, white
town. Everything around us taught us that we shouldn't criticize
our parents; they weren't open to having their views and choices
questioned. I became really focused on school and grades. I lived
in my head a lot, reading constantly and being a perfect student.
Looking back, it seems like I turned the part of me that was critical
off. I had to wait until it was safer to have those kinds of thoughts.
It
was when I had been living away from my parents for about two years,
and had started to organize against racism at the university I was
attending, that I began exploring those questions I had about racism
and transracial adoption again. I think it took organizing around
more general people of color issues for me to realize the political
impact of coming out as a transracial adoptee to other people of
color, and as a person of color to my adoptive family. That may
sound strange, but it's exactly what I mean. I tried to assert myself
as a person of color with a person of color consciousness to my
white family, and to this day I don't think any of them really gets
it; they still reassure me that I'm 'just like their real daughter,'
and that they don't see a difference "whether someone's black,
red, green, or purple."
Trying to politicize the transracial adoption issue in general is
a similar struggle. People aren't used to thinking of transracial
adoptees as people of color, and really haven't been taught to view
transracial adoption as a political issue. There's a lot of wrong
information and stereotypes about transracial adoptees out there.
We're especially interested in reframing transracial adoption as
an issue that affects all communities of color. That's going to
involve breaking down some of the barriers that transracial adoption
sets up between adoptees and other people of color.
Our
Vision for Transracial Abductees
We
like that Transracial Abductees is an activist organization made
up of transracial adoptees who are angry and critical and will continue
to push people's thinking about transracial adoption and people
of color issues in general. Stephanie is a paid community organizer
working on low-income issues and thinks it is a great job, but the
issues are mainstreamed liberal issues. Transracial Abductees, on
the other hand, can be more outspoken and direct about our views
on the adoption industry.
We
envision the organization as an outlet and movement starting organization
that mostly focuses on political education for the time being and
later organizes transracial adoptees on local, national, and international
legislation and has deprogramming camps all over the world.
Building
a Transracial Abductee Movement
There
are rumblings of a transracial abductee movement just beginning
to surface. The very structure of transracial adoption is based
on assimilating to white American society, and mainstream transracial
and international adoptee organizations continue to exist within
this structure. Many adoptees are isolated from communities of color.
To organize and pretty much reverse that assimilation process is
a serious battle. Also, because racism has changed and evolved into
new and more sophisticated forms, this has had major impact on the
white people who choose to adopt children of color. Now, transracial
adoption is viewed as the ultimate form of cultural competency that
puts whites on the road to becoming worldly anti-racist people.
Many choose to adopt children of color, not just because of the
"save the needy" aspect, but for their own social gain
and legitimacy in the world of people of color.
A
movement around transracial adoption that is critical of the adoption
industry is beginning to shape itself in really creative ways. Our
website is one example and there are numerous groups forming in
bigger cities.
In
5 years, we would like to see that the transracial abductee movement
has become a movement and that there are many transracial adoptees
actively organizing in their communities.
In
10 years, there will probably be a mainstream organization that
works on transracial adoptee/abductee issues that is centralized
in a major city. Hopefully, there will be a faction of the organization
that stays pretty angry and more militant. In ten years, the isolated
pockets of abductees that exist now will be much more connected
and will really be able to mobilize adoptees on a larger scale.
About
the Author
Stephanie Cho and Kim So Yung are co-founders of Transracial Abductees,
an organization that works to educate transracial adoptees and communities
of color and expose the unequal power between the white adoption
industry and children of color adoptees. They choose the word "abduction"
to describe how the adoption industry forcibly removes children
of color from their families and communities and assimilates them
into their new white families and society.
|